No HICBC reform: a closer look
The 2024 Autumn Budget made headlines for a number of reasons, but behind the flagship announcements was an important confirmation that planned reforms to how families are subject to the child benefit clawback will be scrapped. What’s the full story?

Background
The high-income child benefit charge (HICBC) has been controversial since its introduction. For one thing, it is assessed on the higher earner, irrespective of whether they are the claimant. This has led to a number of instances where couples who don’t necessarily share financial information between them have been hit with unexpected bills and (in some cases penalties). HICBC has also been criticised for unfairly punishing single-income claimants because it only takes into account the higher earner’s income, not total household income.
Example. For 2024/25, A and B claimed child benefit of just over £2,300. B is currently on extended leave and did not work during the year. A is working full time and, with their annual bonus, have exceeded £80,000. HICBC will apply and clawback the £2,300 in full. C and D also claimed the same amount of benefit. However, both worked during 2024/25 earning just under £60,000 each. There will be no clawback, even though as a household their income is £40,000 higher than A and B.
Reform
The previous government acknowledged this problem, and announced that it would consult on how to reform the HICBC rules to base it on household income.
This plan has now been scrapped by the incoming government. Advise clients to review income sharing arrangements, e.g. rental income, savings, profit extraction, to preserve entitlement.
Instead, the government is focusing on improving collection of the charge. Employees subject to the charge will be able to pay it via a PAYE code adjustment instead of needing to complete a tax return from 2025/26. This will remove the risk of failure to notify and late filing penalties being applied for some claimants.
Related News
-
Income sharing trouble for separated couple
After a couple separated one spouse received income from letting the property she jointly owned with her estranged spouse. HMRC taxed all the income on her. Was it right to do so or should her spouse have been taxed on half the income?
-
How to handle workers aiming to "Slide Away" to an Oasis Concert
The Oasis Live ’25 UK reunion tour starts in Cardiff on 4 July 2025 and concludes in London on 28 September 2025. With ticketless fans keen on obtaining last-minute tickets and ticketed fans eager to get to the gig for when the gates open, this could have an impact on staff productivity and timekeeping. How can you tackle these issues?
-
Is getting your business to pay tax efficient?
You were recently involved in an online discussion about the tax consequences of putting the cost of a celebratory meal for the business owners and staff through the firm’s books. Will doing so save or increase tax overall?